Ranking Russian Novelists

I was an undergraduate when I read The Brothers Karamazov, my first Russian novel.  I powered through that mighty book in one intense weekend, shielded from interruptions by the closed door of my small room. Never before had a novel affected me like Dostoevsky’s classic. Its effect lingered for weeks. I followed up with Crime and Punishment and The Idiot, both memorable, but for me not as powerful as The Brothers Karamazov.

About that time I also sampled Tolstoy, digging into Anna Karenina and thoroughly enjoying it, but stopping there. I didn’t get around to his massive War and Peace until my middle age. For some reason that huge book, dare I say it? disappointed me. I simply couldn’t pull together the sprawl of it all.

The other Russian novel I read during my university days was Dr. Zhivago, this during my rebellious first year of medical school. Pasternak’s story offered welcome periods of relief from my unscholarly battles at the time. His plot, despite its series of improbable coincidences, intrigued me, and calmed me. But in this case I enjoyed the movie more than the book. (I fell in love with Julie Christie’s Lara and the melody of her haunting theme.)

With this skimpy background, on the later rare occasions when I’ve talked with a Russian native, I’ve always managed to ask a question: Who is Russia’s best novelist? The first time I added, naively, Dostoevsky or Tolstoy?

Neither, the man answered, surprising me. Turgenev was our best novelist, he added. I knew the name but nothing beyond that, so I picked up a library copy of Fathers and Sons and discovered it to be a great book. Thinking of it now, with its description of the social upheaval and growing radicalism in mid-nineteenth Russia, I wonder if it resembles certain recent developments in this country. I hope not. The Russian turmoil revealed in Fathers and Sons foreshadowed the Russian revolution that evolved early in the next century.

 

 

Looking closer at Fathers and Sons, I like Turgenev’s methods. He uses little to none of the “show don’t tell” advice favored by many present-day teachers of fiction. He reminds me of a story teller around a campfire, cracking open his characters’ heads for the listener to examine. The father and son combo most prominent in Fathers and Sons is Nikolai Petrovitch Kirsanov the owner of a small estate in rural Russia who tries to keep up, at least partly, with evolving ideas, and his son, Arkady, who has come under the influence of the then-emerging philosophy of nihilism while studying in St. Petersburg.

Follow along as we read snippets of a long scene between two of Turgenev’s other major characters, these being Bazarov (Yevgeny Vassilievitch Bazarov), a medical student and, as he makes abundantly clear, a devoted nihilist. The second is an older woman, a widow, Odintsova (Anna Sergeyevna Odintsova). I’m guessing she’s in her late 30s or early 40s. She is described as wealthy, and with “liberal views”. Odintsova has invited the two students, Arkady and Bazarov, to her elegant house for a stay. Both quickly become infatuated with her. Check out how Turgenev develops this thread of the story in the selected segments below.

“If a woman pleases you,” he [Bazarov] used to say, “try to get to the point; if that’s impossible, well–too bad; turn your back–you’re not at the end of your rope.”  Odintsova pleased him.  The wide-spread rumors about her, her freedom and independence of mind, her definite inclination towards him–everything, it seemed, spoke in his favor; but he soon understood that he would not “get to the point” with her, and to his amazement, he lacked the strength to turn his back on her.  His blood caught fire at just the thought of her; he could have easily subdued his blood, but there was something else taking root inside him–something he did not tolerate at all, which he had always jeered at, and which aroused all his pride. . . . He caught himself in all sorts of “shameful” thoughts, as if a devil were mocking him.

            . . . He [Bazarov] had struck Odintsova’s imagination; he interested her; she thought about him a great deal.  In his absence she was neither bored nor expectant, but his appearance immediately enlivened her;  she enjoyed being alone with him and enjoyed talking to him, even when he angered her or offended her taste, her exquisite ways.  She seemed to want to try him and test herself.

As expected, their attraction grows and leads to the scene below, both characters revealing themselves more completely, with Odintsova speaking first.

            “Listen, I have wanted to speak plainly with you for a long time.  You didn’t have to be told – you know this yourself – that you’re not an ordinary person; you’re still young – your whole life lies before you.  What are you preparing yourself for?  What future awaits you?  I mean – what aims do you want to reach, where are you going, what’s in your heart?  In a word, who are you, what are you?”

            “You surprise me, Anna Sergeyevna.  You know I’m engaged in natural science, while who I am . . .”

            “Yes, who are you?”

            “I’ve already told you that I’m a future country doctor.”

            Anna Sergeyevna gestured impatiently.

            “Why do you say that?  You don’t believe it yourself.  Arkady could answer me that way, but not you.”

            “And how would Arkady-“

            “Stop it!  Is it possible you’d be satisfied with such a humble occupation, and aren’t you always protesting yourself that so far as you’re concerned, medicine doesn’t even exist?  You – with your ambition – a country doctor!  You’re giving me that kind of answer to brush me off because you don’t have any confidence in me.  But, Yevgeny Vassilich, you should know that I’m capable of understanding you: I myself was poor and ambitious like you; perhaps I went through the very same trials as you.”

            “That’s all very fine, Anna Sergeyevna, but you must excuse me.  I’m not generally accustomed to expressing my feelings, and there is such a distance between us. . . .”

            “What distance?”  Are you telling me I’m an aristocrat again”  Enough, Yevgeny Vassilich; I thought I had proved to you–“

            “But besides that,” Bazarove broke in, “what urge is there to think and talk about the future, which for the most part doesn’t depend on us?  Should an opportunity come along to do something – fine; if not – at least one has the satisfaction of not having jabbered for nothing beforehand.”

            “You call a friendly conversation jabbering. . . .  Or, perhaps, you don’t consider me, being a woman, worthy of your confidence?  Of course, you despise us all!”

            “You I don’t despise, Anna Sergeyevna, and you know it.”

            “No, I know nothing – but let’s assume it; I understand your unwillingness to talk about your future occupation, but what’s happening inside you now . . .”

            “Happening!” repeated Bazarov.  “As if I were a kind of state or society!  In any case, it’s not at all interesting; and besides, can a person always say out loud everything that’s ‘happening’ inside him?”

            “I don’t see why one can’t say everything one has on one’s mind.”

            “Can you?” asked Bazarov.

            “I can,” answered Anna Sergeyevna after a brief hesitation. 

            Bazarov bowed his head. “You’re happier than I.”

            Anna Sergeyevna looked at him questioningly.

            “As you wish,” she continued, “but something tells me all the same that we weren’t drawn together for nothing, that we shall be good friends.  I’m certain your, how can I say it, your tenseness, reserve, will disappear in the end.”

            “So you’ve noticed reserve in me – and as you also said – tenseness?”

            “Yes.”

            Bazarov rose and went to the window.

            “And you would like to know the reason for this reserve, you would like to know what’s happening inside me?”

            “Yes,” repeated Odintsova with a kind of fear she was not yet able to understand. “And you won’t get angry?”

            “No.”  Bazarov was standing with his back towards her.

            “Then know that I love you, foolishly, madly. . . . There’s what you elicited!”

            Odintsova stretched out both hands, but Bazarov leaned his forehead against the windowpane. He was gasping; his whole body was visibly trembling.  But it was not the trembling of youthful timidity, not the sweet dismay of the first confession of love which had overcome him; it was passion struggling inside him, strong and tragic – a passion resembling hatred, and perhaps related to it.

            Odintsova felt both fear and pity for him. “Yevgeny Vassilich . . .” she said, and an involuntary strain of tenderness came into her voice.

            He turned around quickly, threw a rapacious glance at her – and seizing both of her hands, suddenly drew her to his chest.

            She did not free herself from his embrace immediately; but in an instant she was standing, looking at Bazarov from a remote corner.  He rushed towards her. . . .

            “You misunderstood me,” she whispered with sudden fear.  It seemed as though if he took another step she would scream.

 Any comments on the above sample? And finally, should you be interested in the current tally of my unscientific poll of Russians choosing their best novelist, the count now has  Dostoevsky leading with 5 (one of his admirers being the Russian physicist I described in my second post on the Brandenburg Gate), Tolstoy with 3, Turgenev 2, Pasternak 1, and Gogol 1 (a writer I’ve not read, and probably won’t).

Group Think

I apologize for the lack of activity here for two long weeks. I’m working on other projects and haven’t taken time to post anything fresh here.  Yesterday, Independence Day, I heard someone sputter about “group think”, a  common phrase these days. But when I heard the words yesterday, they set off that frustrating feeling you get when trying unsuccessfully to pull something from another part of your head. Then, as sometimes happens, the target was identified, something Michael Chrichton had written years ago, a sketch of one of his characters, and a likely suspect. I pulled out my copy of Rising Sun and there it was. Here’s how Chrichton described that particular character.

I found myself thinking of Lauren. When I knew her, she was bright and ambitious, but she really didn’t understand very much. She had grown up privileged, she had gone to Ivy League schools, and had the privileged person’s deep belief that whatever she happened to think was probably true. Certainly good enough to live by. Nothing needed to be checked against reality.

She was young, that was part of it. She was still feeling the world, learning how it worked. She was enthusiastic, and she could be impassioned in expounding her beliefs. But of course her beliefs were always changing, depending on whom she had talked to last. She was very impressionable. She tried on ideas the way some women try on hats. She was always informed about the latest trend. I found it youthful and charming for a while, until it began to annoy me. Because she didn’t have any core, any real substance.  She was expert at watching the TV, the newspaper, the boss – – whatever she saw as the source of authority — and figuring out what direction the winds were blowing. And positioning herself so she was where she ought to be. I wasn’t surprised she was getting ahead. Her values, like her clothes, were always smart and up-to-date.

As many of you know, Michael Crichton graduated from Harvard Medical School and published his first bestseller,The Andromeda Strain, before he graduated from medical school. He was a giant physically (6 feet 9 inches tall) and intellectually (summa cum laude, Harvard), and erudite to the extreme, not to mention immensely productive. His books, among them Jurassic Park sold over 200 million copies. He created and produced the popular television series, ER, a show derived from his medical background. But now back to my point. I applaud Chrichton for vividly sketching a member of the group think crowd.

 

 

John D. MacDonald

Do you know of John D. MacDonald? He was a highly prolific 20th Century writer with amazing talents. He usually is classified as a mystery writer, or a writer of crime and suspense novels, genres I’m not a fan of, but MacDonald was a master storyteller. His characters cleverly untangle themselves from the page and leap out to perform right in front of you, and they reveal what’s making them move. MacDonald’s most famous character is Travis McGee, the protagonist in a series of 21 novels, each of which I’ve read at least twice. Travis is suitably strong, with weaknesses of course, and, good or bad, he’s easy to admire. Here’s a bit of description as Travis drives to the campus of a fictional, and recently constructed State Western University in Arizona, where he will meet one of the principal characters in A Purple Place for Dying. (Each book in the series has a color in its title.). Check out Travis’s musing as he moves along.

“Hundreds of cars winked in the mid-morning sun on huge parking lots. The university buildings were giant brown shoeboxes in random pattern over substantial acreage. It was ten o’clock and kids were hurrying on their long treks from building to building. Off to the right was the housing complex of dormitories and a big garden apartment layout which I imagined housed faculty and administrative personnel. A sign at the entrance drive to the campus buildings read, No Student Cars. The blind sides of the big buildings held big bright murals made of ceramic tile, in a stodgy treatment of such verities as Industry, Freedom, Peace, etc.

“The paths crisscrossed the baked earth.  There were some tiny areas of green, lovingly nurtured, but it would be years before it all looked like the architect’s renderings.  The kids hustled to their ten-o’clocks, lithe and young, intent on their obscure purposes.  Khakis and jeans, cottons and colors.  Vague glances, empty as camera lenses, moved across me as I drove slowly by.  I was on the other side of the fence of years.  They could relate and react to adults with whom they had a forced personal contact.  But strangers were as meaningless to them as were the rocks and scrubby trees.  They were in the vivid tug and flex of life, and we were faded pictures on the corridor walls–drab, ended and slightly spooky.  I noticed a goodly sprinkling of Latin blood among them, the tawny cushiony girls and the bullfighter boys.  They all seemed to have an urgency about them, that strained harried trimester look.  It would cram them through sooner, and feed them out into the corporations and the tract houses, breeding and hurrying, organized for all the time and money budgets, binary systems, recreation funds, taxi transports group adjustments, tenure, constructive hobbies.  They were being structured to life on the run, and by the time they would become what is now known as senior citizens, they could fit nicely into planned communities where recreation is scheduled on such a tight and competitive basis that they could continue to run, plan, organize, until, falling at last into silence, the grief-therapists would gather them in, rosy their cheeks, close the box and lower them into the only rest they had ever known.

“It is all functional, of course, But it is like what we have done to chickens.  Forced growth under optimum conditions, so that in eight weeks they are ready for the mechanical picker.  the most forlorn and comical statements are the ones made by the grateful young who say Now I can be ready in two years and nine months to go out and earn a living rather than wasting four years of college.

“Education is something which should be apart from the necessities of earning a living, not a tool therefor.  It needs contemplation, fallow periods, the measured and guided study of the history of man’s reiteration of the most agonizing question of all:  Why?  Today the good ones, the ones who want to ask why, find no one around with any interest in answering the question, so they drop out, because theirs is the type of mind which becomes monstrously bored at the trade-school concept.  A devoted technician is seldom an educated man.  He can be a useful man, a contented man, a busy man.  But he has no more sense of the mystery and wonder and paradox of existence than does one of those chickens fattening itself for the mechanical plucking, freezing and packaging.”

Perhaps it was thoughtful passages like this that helped MacDonald sell over 70 million books.

Wuhan Waltz Addendum

This evening, while flipping through television stations, I watched a segment reporting that Vanity Fair recently published an extensive article on the origin of the Covid-19. I easily located that article online and found it to be filled with many specifics, along with a narrative of how certain events have unfolded. The dateline of the article is June 3. I’ve only skimmed though the lengthy piece. It will take serious study to digest all of it, but even a quick glance through it reveals disturbing information.

I mention this as a followup to my recent post titled The Wuhan Waltz. If that post interested you, you may want to check out the Vanity Fair article, which provides a  thorough examination of this evolving story. In it you will find names of a sizeable cast of characters involved (their actions not necessarily above board), along with evidence that certain governmental officials in Washington attempted to squelch evidence suggesting the Wuhan laboratory was the source of the virus.  These revelations disturb me, and I hope they disturb you. The widespread destruction from the Covid-19 pandemic is obvious for all to see.  If it arose from gene manipulation in a laboratory, which now appears to be likely, forceful steps must be taken to prevent similar outbreaks in the future. Those in Washington, and elsewhere, must act swiftly and decisively.

The Wuhan Waltz

I have never understood why certain groups of scientists boisterously denounce the possibility that Covid-19 might have been genetically engineered by the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Are they blind? After all, that laboratory is located in the very city where the virus was first discovered, and that laboratory was known to be investigating dangerous varieties of coronavirus.

Two letters, one in the medical journal, Lancet, and the other in Nature Medicine, seem to have satisfied most of the press, along with others, that the virus evolved in nature. Accordingly, major newspapers have churned out articles claiming the virus jumped from bats, or whatever, to humans. And good old Facebook, that exemplary arbitrator of truth, even banned content suggesting the deadly coronavirus might have been manmade, a course it recently reversed.

The wind shifted after many of Anthony Fauci’s emails were made public, quite a few of them heavily redacted but still informative, and after Joe Biden ordered U.S. intelligence agencies to review what is known about the origins of Covid-19.

These new developments prompted me to look deeper into this quagmire. I barely scratched the surface, but I found troubling information.

Key findings

  From 2014 to2019, our National Institutes of Health sent $3.4 million to the Wuhan Institute of Virology through an intermediary, the nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance (more about this entity later). That NIH money was spent on researching bat coronaviruses, and it is widely believed the Wuhan laboratory conducted “gain‑of‑function” research, which in simple terms means intentionally making viruses more virulent.

  A paper about “gain‑of‑function” research on coronaviruses was sent by Dr. Fauci in a February 2020 email to his deputy Hugh Auchincloss. “Read this paper,” he wrote. “You will have tasks today that must be done.” Auchincloss commented on the paper and said they would “try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad”.

What about those two key scientific letters?

The Lancet letter was drafted by Peter Daszak, the longtime president of the EcoHealth Alliance, the New York‑based non‑profit mentioned above, the enterprise that funneled substantial funds from the National Institutes of Health to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. After writing the Lancet draft, Daszak sent it out to others, asking them to sign it. In closing his request, he added this final sentence. Please note that this statement will not have EcoHealth Alliance logo on it and will not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person, the idea is to have this as a community supporting our colleagues.

That Lancet letter contained this phrasing. The rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID‑19 does not have a natural origin. One might question whether China was indeed being transparent in sharing its data. One might also wonder what conspiracy they were talking about. It’s worth noting here that Daszak, despite his obvious conflict of interest, was appointed by the World Health Organization to serve on the investigative panel to probe the origin of Covid-19 in China in early 2021.

  Mr. Duszak does try to cover his tracks. In one of his emails he told researcher Dr. Ralph Baric that they should not sign the statement condemning the lab‑leak theory so that it seems more independent and credible. “You, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn’t work in a counterproductive way,” Daszak wrote.“We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice,” Baric, an epidemiologist at the University of North Carolina agreed. “Otherwise it looks self‑serving and we lose impact,” he wrote back. (Doszak later signed the Lancet letter; Baric did not)

  Professor Baric, by the way, is the individual who in 2015 published a paper with his Wuhan Institute of Virology colleague, Shi Zhengli, in Nature Medicine. The title of that article is A SARS‑like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence.

The second scientific letter

  The letter to Nature Medicine, signed by five virologists, also has an interesting twist. Here’s how science writer Nicolas Wade describes it in the June 5, 2021 Wall Street Journal, drawing his information from the recent release of Dr. Fauci’s emails.

On Jan. 31, 2020, shortly after the SARS‑CoV‑2 genome had been decoded, Kristian Andersen, the five virologists’ leader, emailed Dr. Fauci that there were “unusual features” in the virus. These took up only a small percentage of the genome, so that “one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.”

Mr. Andersen went on to note that he and his team “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.” It isn’t clear exactly what he meant by this striking phrase. But anything inconsistent with an evolutionary origin has to be man‑made.

This remarkable email establishes that the Andersen team’s initial reaction was to suspect that SARS‑CoV 2 had been engineered in a lab. Their subsequent letter doesn’t adequately explain how they overcame this impression.

ŽOther evidence that this deadly virus was genetically engineered is presented by Steven Quay and Richard Muller. Their recent article discusses gain-of-function research and the genetic sequence of the Covid‑19 pathogen. Their concluding sentence reads as follows. The presence of the double CGG sequence is strong evidence of gene splicing, and the absence of diversity in the public outbreak suggests gain‑of function acceleration. The scientific evidence points to the conclusion that the virus was developed in a laboratory.

 

My Precise Internal Clock

I describe my incredible internal clock in my memoir, but the story is of good length for a blog, so I’ll retell it here. First a bit of necessary background.

My mother died at age 37. I was 13 at the time, the oldest of four children. Our dad, with his taste for alcohol and absences, wasn’t a particularly nurturing parent, so we four kids were taken in by our maternal grandparents in the small town of Java, SD.

My grandfather, Jacob Schafer, had quit farming to work as the sole janitor for the Java school building, a sizeable structure that housed grades 1 through 12. I began helping him after school, sweeping rooms and emptying waste baskets, earning a small hourly wage for my efforts. I continued this work until my senior year of high school when I switched from sweeping floors to shoveling coal.

Grandpa was seventy-three by then, and as the winter deepened he found it increasingly burdensome to fill the stoker of the school’s furnace with coal every morning, so I took on that job. I set my alarm clock an hour earlier than usual and fumbled into coal-darkened jeans before looping over to the school to shovel the half a ton of coal chips needed to fill the hopper of the stoker, an amount that would last until the next morning when I repeated the process. After finishing my shoveling, I went back home to clean up and change clothes before breakfast. I paced my preparations by glancing at the mantel clock in the dining room a time or two (I was a few years away from having a watch of my own), and headed back to school, always at the last minute.

First evidence of my internal clock

It was during my first morning rushes to school that I discovered my incredible inner clock. On two consecutive mornings, at the very instant I stepped on the sidewalk in front of the school, the first bell rang, a signal for students to head for their class rooms. This astonishing feat prompted me redouble my efforts for precision. I became addicted to maintaining my accuracy, scrupulously planning each phase of my activities, pacing myself during each step of the way, casting occasional glances on the mantel clock to fine-tune my internal chronometer, although the clock soon became unnecessary. With my carefully monitored routines I achieved a miraculous accuracy. Morning after morning, just as my foot touched the school sidewalk, the first bell rang. My internal clock had developed atomic precision, an accomplishment that gave me enormous pride. Admittedly, there were occasional days that I reached the sidewalk out of sync, and the bell failed to ring as I stepped onto the concrete, but for most mornings, about four out of every five, the bell and I were in sync. It gave me an eerie feeling, this unusual capability of mine.

I told no one about my internal mastery, for I doubted anyone would believe me. But I was quite proud of my inherent ability, an inborn skill I thought somewhat comparable to having perfect pitch, or a photographic memory. I used my astonishing precision for only a few months. As warm weather appeared, the furnace was no longer needed, so my coal shoveling duties ended. I slept longer each morning and eased my way through more relaxing early hours, losing my zeal for precision. But an awareness of my amazing inner clock lingered. I sensed it snoozing in the background, ready to be awakened and snapped into action.

Ken and Grandpa Schafer after the weather warmed

Further information

Some decades later at a school reunion I happened to meet Harold Spiry, the man who had been superintendent of our high school, and the one who had rung the school bell by pressing a buzzer in his office. During our conversation my mind flashed back to what once had been my morning routine, and I couldn’t resist bragging. I told him of how well I had ordered my complex morning work during my senior year, how despite my lengthy string of morning duties, my timing had been impeccable, how morning after morning I had stepped on the school’s sidewalk just as the bell rang.

“Oh that,” he said, his eyes narrowing as he thought back to that time. “Do you recall that my desk and office windows looked out over the front of the building? I could see you coming. When you hit the sidewalk, I rang the bell.”

Iberian Travels, Part 4

Pedro, Bruce, Ken, and Alvaro – Four lambs about to be clipped

As I mentioned at the end of my last post, pleasure was blooming in our cabaret. Pedro, Bruce, Alvaro, and I, with our front row table right on the edge of the dance floor, were beaming. Background music was perking up, thumping with ever louder beat. We had knocked off our round of libations recommended by Alvaro and were working on the bottle of bubbly that magically appeared shortly after our friendly B-girls moved in. These cheery beverages, you’ll remember, were on top of the five glasses of wine we downed before arrival. We were feeling it! If all of that wasn’t enough, the evening’s entertainment was about to begin. What a place!

The B-girls, much like bees buzzing from blossom to blossom, continually shifted among us, hopping from lap to lap, squirming with delight, and making it hard for me to keep track of which one was where. My thoughts were distracted by a fanfare and a dimming of the house lights. A spotlight flashed on the dance floor as a man talked excitedly in the dark until the spotlight found him and reflected off the microphone in his hand.

Flamenco begins

Alvaro whispered to me that the guy was introducing a famous flamenco dancer. After more fanfare and another moment of darkness, the spotlight came back to target a tall woman in a billowy red dress, her hands on her hips. The spotlight widened to include a seated man, guitar in hand. He plunked a few chords, the woman threw her hands in the air, stiffened, and began a slow movement that evolved into some serious and rapid foot stamping and guitar playing. The excitement was contagious, making the B-girl seated on my lap bounce with pleasure.

My attention to the entertainment gradually dimmed and what little remained focused on our table with its energetic B-girls. Amazingly, a second chilled  bottle of bubbly appeared, and the empty first was whisked away. Wow! Nights in Madrid were amazing, and the people so friendly. Our smiles broadened, we whispered back and forth, the squirming girls more intense.  The second bottle had an equally short life, mainly because the B-girls continued their little tricks, filling their glasses to the brim and then jamming their fingers into their drinks and swirling them about, spilling much and wasting their luscious bubbles.

Sign of trouble

The evening flipped abruptly when our tuxedo-clad waiter appeared with a slip on a tray. Pedro picked up the slip, frowned, and turned to Bruce and me. “Did you order the wine?” he asked. We shook our heads.  He asked Alvaro in Portuguese, who quickly replied, “Não!” Those two rattled back and forth, and Pedro passed the bill to me as the B-girls slipped away. For cheap Madrid, the check had quite a pop. I mentally converted pesetas to dollars and came up with roughly $60, something like $15 apiece for us, an amount we all thought exorbitant ($150 in 2021 dollars). We came to agreement in a moment. We hadn’t ordered the wine and damned if we would pay for it.

Alvaro uses a pen to scratch out the two bottles of bubbly on our bill and announced how much each of us owed. He motioned for our waiter, who came over solemnly. Alvaro stated our case. The guy was ready for that and gave what sounded like a dignified and demanding speech of which Bruce and I understood not a word. Alvaro replied, his voice rising. The dialogue turned to shouts and ended when the waiter wheeled abruptly and stomped off.

“We okay?” I asked. “He’s getting the manager,” Alvaro said. The manager, accompanied by our waiter, soon appeared. Again the discussion started calmly but soon escalated, Pedro adding his perspective at times. But agreement was not in sight, and our two antagonists stormed away.

Serious trouble

I turned to Alvaro. “What’s up?”  “He’s going to call the police.” Hmm! This was getting serious, but I was tipsy enough to find it more exciting than worrisome. We four would stand together! In short order, two uniformed policemen came in and were met by the manager. After a short discussion, the three approached. The higher ranking of the cops spoke with Alvaro quietly but with obvious authority. Alvaro replied with careful respect, neither side giving in. Pedro remained silent. Finally Alvaro nodded and turned to Bruce and me. “We’re arrested and will go to jail.”

This was becoming a night to remember! We delinquents were quickly escorted by the pair to a nearby city jail in the basement of an imposing building. In the dimly lit lower floor were something like six cells, all empty, and we four were marched into one of them. The iron gate was closed, the key turned, and the cops left, leaving us locked in a cage the size of a small bedroom, a sturdy wall on one side and vertical steel bars on the other three.

Incarceration is a sobering process. One’s world suddenly is restricted to a tiny space, in our case a few square yards of concrete floor with nothing else, not even a bench, water, or toilet. Fortunately, the red wine and bubbly had darkened my sensibility a few shades, and I was among friends, so I was able to accept my confinement in a manly manner.

 Pedro explained we were in a holding area for people about to go to court. Unbelievable to Bruce and me, court cases like ours were adjudicated at all hours of the day and night. It was early morning by then, somewhere between 2 and 3 a.m. According to Pedro we were due for trial in city court within hours. So justice was swift, and even nocturnal, in Madrid. The idea of going to court worried me a bit, but in my numbness I retained confidence. I had seen enough Hollywood movies to know what to say when apprehended in a foreign country, and I planned to blurt it out as soon as I faced the judge. “I demand to speak with the American consulate!”

A complication arises, and the trial

In the meantime, Alvaro and Pedro were engaged in an urgent conversation. When it ended, they revealed a complication. Alvaro was a Spaniard living in Lisbon on a Spanish passport, and he worried that this transgression might put his passport in jeopardy, so perhaps it would be better if we weren’t demanding at trial, if we agreed to pay the cabaret bill.

This consideration occupied our talk until a guard appeared and escorted us upstairs into an imposing courtroom. We were led to a wooden rail, chest high. Above the rail, and farther back, was a recessed dais, rising a good ten feet above us. On that dais stood an imposing black bench. To our right along the railing, already waiting, was the cabaret manager.

A man in a black robe came in from an upper door and seated himself behind the bench. He made some sort of brief opening statement and then spoke to the manager, who in turn read from some notes while waving the check we had rejected. Then it was our turn, Alvaro speaking for us with obvious cautionary respect. Then the manager again. Pedro whispered that the manager had just said, in the spirit of compromise, that he would reduce the amount we owed to something like two-thirds of the original amount. “See,” I whispered back, “that proves he’s a crook.” Pedro kept my remark confidential.

The resolution, and freedom!

The proceeding was surprisingly cordial. In the end we defendants, sensitive to Alvaro’s delicate position, agreed to pay the reduced amount. We pulled out cash, signed some sort of form, and even shook hands with the manager. Minutes later, we happily skipped out of the building into the oncoming daylight, liberated and not wanting our adventure to end.

We strutted along the wide avenue until Alvaro spotted a coffee shop across the street. Just what we needed! We skipped over, dodging the light early morning traffic. Pedro tried the door. It was locked, but we could see a man and a woman scurrying around inside. We pounded on the window, but they shook their heads and gave a palm-down wiggle of their hands to indicate they hadn’t yet opened.

Coffee with the judge

At that moment who should come into view but the judge from our trial. Pedro and Alvaro hailed him and he came over smiling to chat with them. At one point they pointed to the coffee shop. The judge peered in and tapped on the shop’s window. The woman scurried to open the door and greet the judge, the man following. Apparently they knew him well, and we were invited inside. The woman gestured for us to have a seat along the bar.

Coffee was brewed, we were served, and Bruce and I enjoyed the strong, sobering caffeine while the others shot the breeze in Spanish. We did find an opening, however, to tell the judge, who was competent in English, that we much appreciated his deft and kind handling of our trial.

Everyone seemed to sense it was not a time to linger, so we drained our cups rather hurriedly. Try as I might, I cannot recall who paid for the coffee, if anyone did, but I do remember us four back on the street, waving goodbye to the judge and returning to our boarding house for a bit of rest. For the record, that was my only arrest, ever.

A Look Ahead

Do you pay much attention to your internal clock? At one point in my early life I discovered how astonishingly accurate mine was. Compelling evidence revealed that I possessed eerily accurate timing, an aptitude that I made use of almost daily. But my need for precise timing was temporary, lasting only a few months, and later, after I bought my first watch, I had no need for internal timekeeping, and I ignored what no longer was essential. Years later, the issue resurfaced, with a surprising result. I’ll tell that story next time.

Iberian Travels, Part 3

During one of the amazing lunches at our Madrid boarding house, Pedro and Alvaro struck up a conversation with a pair of Spaniards seated across the table. The friendly pair had been working in Madrid for some months and knew the city well. As I mentioned in my last post, Pedro had the better English, but it was Alvaro who starred in Spanish. Portuguese and Spanish share a huge number of cognates so speakers of one country can converse reasonably well with those from the other, but pronunciation and rhythm vary considerably between the languages. Alvaro’s vowels, his inflections, his fluidity, perfectly mimicked the Spanish speakers, but Pedro’s words at times seemed off kilter, and his hesitations were obvious.

 These differences were particularly noticeable when a hot topic suddenly widened their eyes and revved voices to a higher pitch, Alvaro nodding enthusiastically and Pedro, after a slight pause, following. When the laughter ended and things finally calmed down, Pedro relayed the gist of the conversation to Bruce and me. The Spaniards had described a Madrid tradition, one in which visitors in the city are invited by local residents for an evening tour of the local wine shops.

 The basics were simple. Tours would begin at the nearest wine shop, where all would enjoy a small glass of wine before moving on to the next shop for another glass; participants would continue this routine until every wine shop in Madrid had been patronized. The laughter apparently had erupted when Pedro voiced what was obvious. Wine shops are ubiquitous in Madrid, so no tour could ever be completed. Participants would be blotted out after their first a half dozen shops. After this gaiety the duo had invited Alvaro and Pedro for a tour that very evening, and us too, if we wanted to join in. Bruce and I threw our thumbs up.

The Tour Begins

Late that evening, well after darkness fell, the six of us set out on what would become a most formidable evening. We walked no more than a long city block before coming to our first wine shop. It was small, no larger than an average hotel room, with a bar along one end, bottles layered behind it, dozen of patrons imbibing, and peanut shells covering the floor.

 My few days in Madrid had made clear how inexpensive everything was for Bruce and me, but I still felt a pleasant thrill of incredulity when Pedro explained that a small glass of house wine, red or white, was being sold for the equivalent of two cents per glass. We all chose red and talked and sipped as we cracked peanuts and scattered the shells across the floor. After a suitable time we paid up and moved on to our second wine shop.

 We caught our rhythm, idling for about twenty minutes in each shop, allowing time enough to eye the customers, compare our two-cent reds to those of the last shop, add to the floor’s collection of peanut shells, and softly mumble the small talk one slips into with new acquaintances. By shop number three Bruce and I had begun to wonder how long we would last. The clock above a huge black wine bottle indicated it was 10:35, still a good hour before Madrid’s real night life would begin.

As midnight neared, our group stood quite jolly in our fifth wine shop. Our zeal for progress had been slowed by foresight, not to mention the necessity to maintain our senses. At that stage we were only mildly buzzed. Each of the small glasses we had downed over a couple of hours contained roughly two ounces of wine, or perhaps a bit more, so our total consumption was only about 10-12 ounces of wine, its absorption being modestly delayed by handfuls of macerated peanut particles.

At this juncture our local hosts unexpectedly begged off, explaining they were due for work early in the morning, but urging us to continue our celebration by visiting a cabaret. They recommending a popular one and provided directions to it.

We sent them off with our thanks and enthusiastically made our way to the swanky place they had recommended. We easily caught a table, for we were among the earliest arrivals. The lighting was dim, the waiters in tuxedos, the music with steady beat. After we were seated, Alvaro suggested we try a favorite libation of his. We placed the order. As we checked out our surroundings, Pedro asked our waiter to take a photo.

 

Left to right we are: Pedro, Bruce, Ken, and Alvaro, newly arrived at the cabaret

 

Our drinks arrived, we clinked glasses in honor of our friendship. One instant later, smiling girls appeared at our table, happy Spanish in their voices. I said, “Good evening,” and one of the girls said “Goood eev-neeng,” and plunked herself on my lap, squirming a bit as she settled in. I took her little quivers as a sign she was quite excited about practicing her English. Within moments a fat bottle of cold bubbly appeared. How nice of them! I thought. I took the bottle to be Champagne, but it likely was a local cava. Glasses were filled. Toasts followed.

I can’t swear how many B-girls were actually at our table, they kept flitting from lap to lap, squirming enthusiastically, but the number three shimmers in memory. They had this funny habit of stirring their drinks with their fingers, swirling vigorously so that bubbles erupted and most of the precious liquid gushed out onto the table. I thought it a horrible waste but was having too much fun to object. And I knew the floor show was about to begin.

Intermission

Whew! I meant to finish this story here, but this is getting long and the gurus of blogging warn against wearing out your readers. Most suggest that something like 750 words work best for a single post. I’m now nearly at 1,000, and I still have more crucial events to cover, so I’ll stop here and let us catch our breath. Admittedly, I’m putting off telling of my time in jail, but I don’t want any of you to sleep through that episode. I’ll reveal all in a post within the next few days. Cross my heart!

In the meantime, if you haven’t already done so, please sign up to receive an email notification each time I post something new. That way you’ll be among the first to see me behind bars. I’ve checked out the process by entering my own email address, and it works great. Having said that, I know that a good number of you have tried to sign up but somehow didn’t receive the confirmatory email necessary to click on to activate the process. Then, when you tried again, you got a message telling you to return the non-existent email sent the first time (but I think a plan B was suggested). Bummer!!! I’m looking into that.

Iberian Travels, Part 2

By the time our train stopped at the border between Portugal and Spain to be checked by customs officers (a hassle no longer required when traveling between countries of the European Union), Bruce and I had learned a bit about Pedro and Alvaro, the two young men we had met at the Lisbon train station. Pedro was soon to enter medical school, and Alvaro was studying another field, I think business, or perhaps international relations. As our train began moving again and picking up speed, we four continued our enthusiastic blabber, speculating on what we might do in Madrid, swapping ideas, telling jokes, having no notion that trouble lay ahead.

Our new friends were better prepared for their stay than we were. They had made reservations in a boarding house, whereas Bruce and I were traveling wild, hoping to find a centrally located hotel with a room available. When we mentioned this, Pedro suggested there might be a room available for us in their boarding house, which he said was located close to the train station, and quite inexpensive. That sounded good to us.

We four were behaving like old friends by the time we reached Madrid. Pedro, who had better English than Alvaro, translated signs for us as we walked out of the train station and onto a broad street toward the boarding house, which was only minutes away. Luckily, the proprietor told us, he did have a double room available for, as he called us, Pedro and Alvaro’s friends. The price he quoted was so low that I did an fast estimate and quickly rechecked my math, thinking the rate could not be so unbelievably cheap. But it was. For our room and two meals daily, Bruce and I would pay the equivalent of $1.25. (Taking into account that the 2021 dollar is worth only about 10% of its 1953 value, our cost in today’s dollars would be $12.50 per day; still quite a bargain, wouldn’t you say?)

Our room was clean, the beds comfortable, and the food just what we needed. Good and plentiful! For breakfast we were provided mainly baked goods such as baguettes spread with olive oil and other toppings, or croissants, along with coffee and juices. Lunch was the big meal of the day. It started late by our standards, about mid-afternoon. We boarders, more than a dozen of us, gathered at a long table and ate family style through a number of courses, the second being either fish, chicken, pork, or beef. The entire meal was an experience. Never before nor after have I consumed midday meals in such a leisurely and convivial manner, each being a languid episode marked by savoring, listening, swallowing, smiling, observing, and occasionally talking, and spanning two or more hours every day.

It was during these meals that I learned to eat a banana Spanish style. Bananas were among the selections available for dessert, and on the first day I was about to pick mine up and peel it when I saw others lay their fruit across their plates and pick up their knives and forks in typical European style, fork in left hand, knife in right. Stabilizing their banana with their fork, they slit its peel lengthwise and pushed its edges back to expose the full length of the fruit. Then they stuck their forks into the left tip of their bananas and neatly sliced off bite-sized morsels before left-handing them into their mouths. This sequence was repeated for the life of each banana, diners snipping off their delicate bites until only peels remained.

This trick was a cinch for me to pick up because I had eaten that way since childhood. When I was very young I constantly transferred my fork while eating, moving it from my left hand to right and back again, eating ambidextrously. One day my father, somehow exasperated by all this switching, told me with some emphasis, “Stop moving your fork from hand to hand.” Being suitably obedient at that tender age, I complied, my fork at that moment located in my left hand. From that time forward I have consistently curled my left fingers around forks, freeing my right hand for knife work. Only when I arrived in Europe at age 20 did I discover that an entire continent had copied my manner of eating.

On our second full day in Madrid, we four invaded the Prado museum, a fabulous attraction with a huge collection of Spanish paintings, these combined with a good inventory of works of other famed artists. As we wandered through the rooms, I was wowed by works by Rubens, Raphael, Durer, Titian, and Rembrandt, among others. But the painting that struck me with the greatest force was none of these. Nor was it notable for elegant brush strokes, or other forms of artistic prettiness; it just froze my blood. It was Goya’s The Third of May 1808 that held my attention like no other in that museum. In that huge canvas (it is something like nine feet tall and eleven wide) Goya depicts Napoleon’s soldiers executing Spanish patriots who had rebelled against the French occupation just one day earlier, a huge lamp lighting the bloody scene. Its impact on me was enormous, a picture of killing in cold blood.

I downloaded an image of the painting from www.museodelprado.es to show it here. Even now it grabs my attention.

Goya painted a companion canvas, The Second of May 1808, which illustrates the reason for the executions shown above; this image depicting Spaniards rioting in Madrid and being attacked by Mamelukes of the French Imperial Guard. It is a painting of equal size to the one above, with perhaps even more carnage, but for me it wields less power, maybe because its savagery is more balanced, both Spaniards and Guardsmen are slaughtering and being slaughtered, their deaths not as one-sided as in the execution scene where the firing squad massacres unarmed men. Should you be interested, you can find this second work at the above website.

This post is getting a bit long, so rather than wear you out, I’ll stop here and continue our Madrid adventures next time, finally confessing my arrest, and subsequent incarceration, in that fine city.

Iberian Travels

The Iberian Peninsula is a vague corner of Europe for me. I’ve traveled there only twice, my trips decades apart. On the last one I jetted to Madrid and caught a high-speed train to Seville where I had been invited to participate in a conference on hypertension. The organizers had booked me in a room going for the equivalent of nearly $500 per night, and I was eager to inspect the luxury they were providing for me. When my taxi pulled up in front of a nondescript building with a faded hotel sign on one corner, I told him it must be the wrong place, but he insisted it was the address I’d given him. How correct he was!

The world fair, Expo 92, was in full swing at that time, and lodging costs in Seville had soared through the clouds. My room and bath turned out to be large and serviceable, but I could detect not one smidgen of opulence. After the conference ended, as a good tourist I spent a day on the Expo grounds and had my pocket picked (the police later found my wallet, cash absent but all else intact). On the following day, still troubled with a twinge of traveler’s remorse, I high-speeded back to Madrid and boarded a plane for Munich where I was living at the time.

 That brief trip was completely different from my first look at the region, which had unfolded nearly forty years earlier. That one also began from Germany and was planned not long after my weather unit had transferred from Landsberg to Ramstein, an American Air Force base near Kaiserslautern. It was early fall, the air was cooling, and friend Bruce and I, yearning for warmer climes, were on alert for any military aircraft soon to head south. We found one scheduled to head for Portugal in about five weeks, thus giving us plenty to time to have our furlough orders cut. Here’s what part of my orders said, in typical Air Force speak:

 A/1C Kenneth L Goetz . . .31st Wea Sq, is granted twenty (20) days ord lv of absence eff o/a 6 Nov 53 for the purpose of visiting US and French Zones of Germany, Spain, Portugal, France, Switzerland, and Austria. Reservations and visas where nec w/b obtained by the indiv. Travel via US mil acft on a space aval non-revenue basis auth.

Two points of explanation: 1) The last sentence authorized the travel perk I mentioned in earlier posts, namely that I could fly free to my destination, which in this case was Lisbon. 2) Although Bruce and I planned to travel by train from Lisbon to Madrid, and then on to Barcelona, we weren’t yet sure what rail path we would take from there back to our base, so Switzerland and Austria were added just in case our train travels wandered a bit eastward from our more direct path back to Germany through France.

On the appointed day, Bruce and I each lugged a suitcase aboard a C-47, the workhorse of Air Force transportation then, and settled in for our flight to Lisbon. The C-47 was the military version of the Douglas DC-3 commercial version, but don’t envision the C-47 as having soft reclining seats. What it did have, on each side of the cargo bay, was a row of metal seats, about14 per side. As I remember, each “seat” was essentially a concavity shaped for you to plunk your rear into. And you couldn’t lean back because the wall of the fuselage was right behind you, and it curled inward as it rose, so you tended to lean forward as you flew. Were there any windows to look out of? Some C-47s had a few portholes, some didn’t. Did I ever complain about these little details? Not once! Being young and flying free was a beautiful thing.

C-47s were driven by two husky propellers that enabled the planes to cruise along at about 160 mph, so our flight to Lisbon stretching over 1,100 miles, probably took about seven hours, dismally long when compared with today’s jet schedules, but for Bruce and me, the only passengers on that flight, our air time tingled with anticipation, not boredom, and the hours flew by.

The Hollywood movie, The Miracle of Our Lady of Fatima, had come out a year before our visit to Lisbon, and Bruce, being a good Catholic, was hot to visit the site. We had learned Fatima lies north of Lisbon, a drive of about 80 miles, so on our second day in Portugal, we found a car and driver and negotiated a fine cheap fare. This was before credit cards were in vogue, so before leaving our base we had purchased plenty of American Express travelers cheques in dollar denominations, these being easily exchangeable for the appropriate foreign currencies as we moved from one country to another. Unlike today, the U.S. dollar was a mighty beast at the time, and we were able to exchange each dollar for about 170 Portuguese escudos, a rate making our expenses in that country amazingly inexpensive. We didn’t throw our money away, but we happily splurged. Free flights and the powerful dollar allowed us to travel in style!

To nourish us on our excursion to Fatima, we loaded up on fruit and sandwich ingredients from a small grocery and had all packed into a large paper sack. Our driver was a serious fellow who spoke no English, and we of course no Portuguese, so sign language carried the day. As we made our way steadily northward, Bruce and I put together sandwiches in the back, downed non-alcoholic bottled drinks, and marveled at the unfamiliar terrain. The passing groves of olives caught our attention early, but soon became commonplace. We urged our driver to sample our tasty snacks, wanting him to enjoy what we had carefully selected, but he shook his head vigorously and indicated it would be illegal for him to eat or drink while driving.

Fatima had its charm. Some places were familiar and brought back to me scenes from the film, but the story of the miracle told by local guides was more complicated than the movie’s version, at times being noticeably inconsistent with it, a conflict that confused the entire matter for me. Despite all this, the visitors we spoke with, coming from several countries, were clearly in awe of the surroundings. Most importantly, the entire day formed itself into a perfect motor trip.  Bruce and I filled it with endless energy as we bounced through the hours, our attitudes lofty and quite worldly, and all lasting through our return journey. Our careful driver steered us safely back to Lisbon, dropped us off at our hotel by late afternoon, and drove off smiling with his parting tip.

Nearly everyone can recall certain incidents that abruptly jerked their lives onto totally unexpected paths. Bruce and I had one of those moments as we were leaving Lisbon. We had taxied to the train station, bought our rail tickets to Madrid, exchanged our remaining escudos for Spanish pesetas, found the appropriate track for our departure, and were idly watching as clusters of fellow passengers gathered around us. Suddenly an abrupt chorus of loudspeakers blasted our ears with what sounded like an urgent message. The crowd around us muttered, picked up their luggage, and drifted away, leaving Bruce and me gaping at each other.

As we watched the exodus, two young men of about our age noticed our hesitancy and came back to ask, in English, if we understood that the train to Madrid had been moved to a different track, a useful bit of news and a happenstance that reshaped our immediate future. For at that instant Pedro and Alvaro became our travel companions. We four found adjacent coach seats and became acquainted as we sped into Spain, Bruce and I having no inkling of the marvelous exploits that lay ahead with our new friends. Without them, we surely could never have found such an insanely inexpensive boarding house for our stay. Nor would we have explored Madrid, day and night, with the uninhibited gusto we managed with our new companions. And, had we not been with them, we certainly would never have been locked into a Spanish hoosegow. I’ll tell of our sudden arrest, and other Madrid adventures, soon.